Reading electronic communication with love,
I am Gabriel Josef Werle,
and this essay describes an intellectually uncovered possibility
to reset climate change and social injustice:
Solving Climate Change and Social Injustice
Through the Introduction of a Rule
that structures purchasing acts,
whose effects extend beyond the sensory perception horizon of the average consumer,
with the fairness that every living being wishes to encounter within its sensory perception horizon:
All mammals have felt embedded in the world of their social interactions since their existence.
The emergence of thinking in sentence constructions about 150,000 years ago
did not change the innate sense of being integrated into the community of the sensually experienced immediate world.
-> The rise of globalized markets and world trade
led to an unfortunate overlap:
a feeling of being embedded {as a consumer} in the immediate world,
and, at the same time, the near-complete influence of their consumption behavior on the distant world.
The widespread implementation of a work culture and, for the past 200 years, a leisure culture
characterized by written communication
temporarily diminished, through the associated intellectualization of society,
the impact of consumption on the distant world via intellectual discourse.
The rise of New Media,
mainly consumed during leisure time,
marked by communication through (moving) images,
brought the feeling of being embedded in the immediate world,
which is naturally ingrained in us,
back to the forefront,
while the effects of consumption on the distant world remained!
Since higher animals tend toward intra-species harmony,
we humans
{even in our role as consumers}
also strive for that harmony
which we hope, wish, and expect to find in our immediate surroundings throughout our lives.
Additionally, as consumers,
we consume the impact of our actions on our immediate social environment,
not the effects on people and nature beyond our sensory perception horizon.
-> The universal pursuit of fairness within the perceived world should – in my view – urgently be proven through psychology.
How does the daily perception horizon relate to the boundary of fairness
that an individual {in their role as a consumer}
can achieve in everyday life?
If it is indeed true that the vast majority of people
strive for fairness within their perceived world
and feel unqualified to enforce this fairness through consumption
beyond their daily perception horizon,
then governments should
apply existing laws
to ensure that all products,
produced and/or transported beyond the immediate world of the assumed average consumer,
are produced fairly and with
the level of CO₂ emission/immissions
as required by exact science!
A world where everything
is fair and produced with the CO₂ balance
as demanded by science,
is a fair and green world.